Side-by-Side Comparison
Heroku vs Render
Detailed side-by-side comparison of Heroku, Render to help you pick the best tool.
| Feature | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | ||
| Rating |
You can compare up to 4 tools. Add more tools →
Reviews Summary
Heroku
(49)
Side-by-Side Comparison
Detailed side-by-side comparison of Heroku, Render to help you pick the best tool.
| Feature | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | ||
| Rating |
You can compare up to 4 tools. Add more tools →
4.6/5.0 |
| Reviews | 49 reviews | 38 reviews |
| TT Score | TT 72/100 | TT 69/100 |
| Pricing Model | Paid | Freemium |
| Starting Price | $5/mo | Free |
| Free Trial |
| Platforms | Web | Web |
| Deployment | Cloud | Cloud |
| Founded | 2007 | 2018 |
| Team Size | 201-500 | 11-50 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, CA | San Francisco, CA |
| Verified |
| Has Deal | Free tier — static sites + web services |
| Upvotes | 211 | 208 |
| Recommend % | N/A | N/A |
| Action |
Best decision we made this year
Easy to use, great support, powerful features, regular product updates, fair pricing
Can have a learning curve initially. Some advanced features require training.
Powerful but has some quirks
Powerful feature set, customizable, integrates with everything we use
Steep learning curve, inconsistent support, UI could be modernized
Solid platform that delivers
Intuitive interface, excellent integrations, reliable performance, good documentation
Some features are gated behind higher pricing tiers. Mobile app could be better.
Excellent value for money
Great pricing, generous free tier, fast performance, regular improvements
Enterprise features are limited. Reports could use more customization options.
Best decision we made this year
Easy to use, great support, powerful features, regular product updates, fair pricing
Solid platform that delivers
Intuitive interface, excellent integrations, reliable performance, good documentation
Can have a learning curve initially. Some advanced features require training.
Some features are gated behind higher pricing tiers. Mobile app could be better.