Side-by-Side Comparison
Moosend vs ActiveCampaign
Detailed side-by-side comparison of Moosend, ActiveCampaign to help you pick the best tool.
| Feature | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | ||
| Rating |
You can compare up to 4 tools. Add more tools →
Reviews Summary
Moosend
(35)
Side-by-Side Comparison
Detailed side-by-side comparison of Moosend, ActiveCampaign to help you pick the best tool.
| Feature | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | ||
| Rating |
You can compare up to 4 tools. Add more tools →
4.5/5.0 |
| Reviews | 35 reviews | 182 reviews |
| TT Score | TT 64/100 | TT 91/100 |
| Pricing Model | Free Trial | Free Trial |
| Starting Price | $9/mo | $15/mo |
| Free Trial |
| Platforms | Web | WebiOSAndroid |
| Deployment | Cloud | Cloud |
| Founded | 2011 | 2003 |
| Team Size | 51-200 | 501-1000 |
| Headquarters | London, UK | Chicago, IL |
| Verified |
| Has Deal | Save ~15% with annual billing |
| Upvotes | 172 | 1304 |
| Recommend % | N/A | N/A |
| Action |
Best decision we made this year
Easy to use, great support, powerful features, regular product updates, fair pricing
Can have a learning curve initially. Some advanced features require training.
Excellent value for money
Great pricing, generous free tier, fast performance, regular improvements
Enterprise features are limited. Reports could use more customization options.
Game-changer for our team
Massive time savings, clear ROI, beautiful UI, strong feature set
Pricing scales quickly with team size. A few features still in beta.
Solid platform that delivers
Intuitive interface, excellent integrations, reliable performance, good documentation
Some features are gated behind higher pricing tiers. Mobile app could be better.
Good but room for improvement
Affordable, active development, decent feature set, responsive product team
Powerful but has some quirks
Powerful feature set, customizable, integrates with everything we use
Some clunky workflows, occasional bugs, limited customization in some areas
Steep learning curve, inconsistent support, UI could be modernized